Most of the times people think to build a mobile application. Everyone comes with the great and innovative ideas for their application but gets stuck by thinking of coding or programming. Some stops acting by just analyzing the number of platforms which are available in the market to develop the mobile application.
There are a lot of questions starts striking like which platform I should choose? What are the pros and cons of that platform? Which platform is suitable for my app? And some more. But now beat that fear and let’s get to know the detailed info about all platforms in this one article. This is the right place which would be the answer to all the questions which arises while making a mobile application.
Let’s see the information about each platform with its pros and cons so you can compare and choose the best platform for the development of your mobile application.
1. Appcelerator
In Year:- 2011 Language:- Java Script. Ideal For:- iOS, Android. Developed By:- Jeff Haynie & Nolan Wright. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
2. PhoneGap
In Year:- 2011 Language:- CSS3, HTML5, Java script. Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Windows Developed By:- Nitobi (Adobe Sys. Purchased in 2011). |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
3. Sencha
In Year:- 2015 Language:- HTML5. Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Windows phone, Tizen, Blackberry, Kindle. Developed By:- Sencha |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
4. Adobe AIR
In Year:- 2008 Language:- HTML5. Ideal For:- iOS, Android, blackberry Tablet OS, Mac OS, MS Windows, Black Berry 10. Developed By:- Adobe System. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
5. Ionic
In Year:- 2012 Language:- HTML, CSS, Java Script. Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Windows. Developed By:- Ben Sparry and max Lynch. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
6. SAP
In Year:- 2012 Language:- HTML, CSS, Java Script. Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Windows. Developed By:- Ben Sparry and max Lynch. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
7. Qt
In Year:- 2014 Language:- C++, QML. Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Windows phone, Mac OS, Linux. Developed By:- Trolltech (1991-2000),Nokia(2000-2008), QTproject(2011-Pres.), Digia(2012-2014),The QT Company. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
8. Jquery Mobile
In Year:- 2010 Language:- Java Script. Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Blackberrry,Windows phone, Web OS, Symbian. Developed By:- The J-query team. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
9. Native Script
In Year:- 2014 Language:- Java Script, Type Script. Ideal For:- Android, iOS. Developed By:- Progress and community. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
10. Rho Mobile Suite
In Year:- Language:- Java Script, HTML5, CSST3. Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Windows phone, Windows 10 Mobile, Windows CE, Windows Mobile, Windows NT. Developed By:- |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
11. Convertigo Studio
In Year:- Language:- Ideal For:- Android, iOS, Windows. Developed By:-Convertigo |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
Related: 10 Reasons Why Mobile Apps Are Better Than Mobile Websites
12. Intel XDK
In Year:- 2017 Language:- Java Script, HTML5, Java, C#, C++, Objective C Ideal For:- Android, iOS. Developed By:-Intel |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
13. Xamarine
In Year:- 2011 Language:- C# Ideal For:-Native Android, ios & Windows with native UI windows and Mac OS. Developed By:-Miguel de Icaza & Nat Friedman |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
14. Dojo
In Year:- 2005 Language:- Java Script, type Script. Ideal For:-Android, iOS. Developed By:-Dojo Foundation. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
15. Kony
In Year:- 2007 Language:- Ideal For:-Mobile app platform. Developed By:-Enter prise Software. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
16. Andriod Studio
In Year:- 2013 Language:- Java, Kotlin Ideal For:-Android, Mac OS & Window, Linux. Developed By:- Google JetBrain. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
17. X- Code
In Year:- 2003 Language:- Swift, C, C++, Objective C & C++, Java, Apple Script, Python, Ruby. Ideal For:-MacOS, iOS, watchOS, and tvOS. Developed By:- Apple Inc. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
18. Firebase
In Year:- 2011 Language:- Swift, Java script, Objevtive C, Node.js Ideal For:-iOS, Android. Developed By:- James Tamplin and Andrew Lee |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
19. Code Name
In Year:- 2012 Language:- Java Ideal For:-MacOS, Windows, Android, Blackberry, iOS and others. Developed By:- James Tamplin and Andrew Lee |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
20. Android NDK
In Year:- 2009 Language:- Java Ideal For:-iOS, Android Developed By:- Google |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
21. Fire Monkey
In Year:- 2011 Language:- Delphi Ideal For:-Windows, MacOS, iOS, Android Developed By:- Embarcadaro Technologies. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
22. Corona SDK
In Year:- 2009 Language:- Lua (Corona API) Ideal For:-MacOS, tvOS, Android, Windows, Kindle Fire, Android TV. Developed By:- Corona Labs Inc. |
||
– Corona has two operational modes
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
23. iOS SDK(iPhone SDK)
In Year:- 2008 Language:- Java, .Net, Adobe Flash. Ideal For:-iOS, Mac OS. Developed By:- Apple Inc. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
24. Meme IDE
In Year:- 2011 Language:- Java, C++, C#. Ideal For:-Windows Mobile 6.5, Android 2.1+, iOS, BlackBerry. Developed By:-Meme Apps. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
25. Lambda Native
In Year:- 2018 Language:- Scheme. Ideal For:-iOS, Android, Blackberry, Windows, Mac OS, Linux. Developed By:-Pediatric Anesthesia Research Team, Digital Health Innovation Lab. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
26. Mono
In Year:- 2014 Language:- C, C#, XML. Ideal For:-Windows, Mac OS, Linux. Developed By:-Ximian |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
27. Ruby Motion
In Year:- 2012 Language:- C, C++, Objective-C, Java, Ruby. Ideal For:- iOS, Mac OS X, Android. Developed By:-HipByte |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
28. ViZi Apps
In Year:- 2010 Language:- Online Service. Ideal For:- iOS, Android. Developed By:-ViZi Apps Inc. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
29. Marmalade
In Year:- 2016 Language:- C++ Ideal For:- iOS, Android, Windows Phone 8, Mac OS X, Windows, Tizen, Roku. Developed By:-Marmalade Technologies LTD. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
30. Live Code
In Year:- 2001 Language:- Java Ideal For:- MacOS, Windows, Linux, Unix, Android, iOS, HTML5. Developed By:-Live Code LTD. |
||
|
||
Pros:-
|
||
Cons:-
|
Conclusion:
It is as simple to choose the platform for you mobile application if you could decide to develop a mobile app in one platform out of Cross, Native and Hybrid. Article helps you to choose the best way on which you think to develop the app with the all facilations comes in that. By getting the knowledge of all above platform you can sort out the best platforms for your mobile application development.